Amalgamation: Lets have a proper debate

Amalgamation, that’s the flip side of the de-amalgamation debate, the side we hardly hear about.  Actually debate is the wrong word as it requires at least 2 opposing arguments.  Where’s the pro amalgamation team? After all there were good reasons to amalgamate in the first place, weren’t there.

I recall attending an amalgamation meeting in Rockhampton with the then Local Government Minister Andrew Fraser where he commented on the hospitable reception.  Maybe the arguments for amalgamation of greater efficiencies and better management seem redundant presently.  However, the feeling from that meeting was that amalgamation was necessary for the region’s economic growth.  A prevailing perception that the region was suffering due to Rockhampton City’s smaller population and growth rate compared to other regional cities.  The previously amalgamated Mackay was one example.  Growth in Yeppoon, north of Parkhurst and Gracemere were not included in Rockhampton City economic indicators despite the proximity.  Combine these interlinked communities population and a more attractive package is presented to investors.  One can argue that after 4 years of amalgamation evidence of greater investment in our region exists. 

Mistakes with the amalgamation process were arguably made.  However, wouldn’t it more productive to put our energies into rectifying the mistakes and improving the process then to dismantle it?  Would the 4 point size footnote under Rockhampton regions future economic indicators explaining the 28000 decrease in population be noticed by investors? Would a 28000 populated shire make their short list?  Investors deciding the location of the next Myers or foreshore development for example. 

Supporters for de-amalgamation have their reasons and it’s healthy to argue for them.  Without balance though are the residents in the former Livingstone Shire making an informed decision or more an emotive one?  With the current national and international attention Central Queensland is receiving wouldn’t it be better to remain united than divided.  Splitting but remaining close friends sounds like an amicable separation, but will two bureaucracies happily co-exist or file for divorce.  Let’s have a proper balanced debate.  Champions of amalgamation please step forward and present your arguments for keeping the status quo. (Be interesting to know how many councillors will be amongst you).